The Fly Fishing Forum banner

Travel rods

3 reading
129 views 13 replies 9 participants last post by  Ard  
#1 ·
The Winston 5-piece rod thread that I saw here on the forum gave me reason to think. I DO have one travel rod, a 6-piece, 8' 4WT Chinese model that was VERY inexpensive and which is actually fine, punching way above its weight, but not something that anyone would call a "good rod". Given that I retired about 5 years ago and I'm trying to catch up some on the fact that I didn't travel or fly fish a lot during my working years, I constantly wonder if I don't need a better travel rod than the one that I've got that would fit easily into a checked bag or perhaps even into a carry-on for those trips when I simply don't want to be weighed down with my normal kit.

Although I do occasionally fish a bigger stream/river that might require a bigger punch, most of the streams that I fish locally or that I'm more inclined to travel to are probably best-suited to a 3, 4 or maybe a 5-weight rig and generally, if not a very small stream, I lean towards 8-9 foot rods more than anything shorter (other than my bamboo rods which are often/usually in the 7-8 foot range). So, if I WERE to get myself a decent travel rod, it would likely be in the 8'6" 4WT or 9' 5WT range, something that you could use for trout most anywhere in the world, even if it weren't perfect or ideal. A good example of what a normal trip might look like for me is one that I'm planning for June of this year to Park City, Utah to fish the Weber (maybe the Provo), Strawberry Reservoir, Duchesne River and likely several alpine lakes in the Uinta Mountains (which will involve at least some backpacking). The potential for 20+" trout is there, but the average fish on that trip will be much less than that and some of them will be 10 inchers. Some of the streams will be very small, but I'll also fish the lakes and the Weber and Provo are both relatively large streams by my standards.

I'm not the guy to spend $600, $800 or $1000 on a rod. I don't begrudge others that opportunity, nor do I ever suggest that more expensive rods are junk or don't have value, it's just not me for whatever reason (not entirely because I can't afford stuff like that if I REALLY wanted it). So, I'd probably be looking at a new rod that was in the $200-350 range or possibly looking at a used rod that was in great shape and maybe worth a couple hundred bucks in its present/used condition. I've even toyed with the idea of trying to find a nice one and offering one of the bamboo rods that I've built in exchange for it (don't get too excited, anything that I'd trade would have at least a couple of warts, although all of the bamboo rods that I've built have been MORE than adequate, fine and good).

Just looking for some ideas about the better lines of travel rods that have been built over the years (I did learn a bit from that Winston 5-piece thread and it's obvious that people liked that line) and how easy or inexpensive it may be to find good options at any given time.
 
#2 ·
The Redington Trailblazer 590-6 gets decent reviews. It's been discontinued (apparently replaced by the Trailblazer), but you also might see if you can find a leftover Redington Classic Trout 590-6.

For used/vintage, it's shorter than you'd want, but you might be able to find an original Scott G 844/5 for around the top end of your budget.

If wanting to fit in a carry on bag, I suspect you'd need to focus on a 6-piece given your desired length. Not sure a 5-piece would fit even diagonally.

Good luck to you!
 
#3 ·
Thanks. 8'4" 4 WT would probably be enough for most of my travel and would be ideal for a lot of it. Thanks for the other recommendations as well. Not sure about 6-piece Classic Trout, but I must be the only guy alive that didn't really care for that rod (the 4-piece model). I had an 8'6" 5 WT (I've heard that it wasn't the best representation of that line admittedly) and honestly, I didn't care for it. Partly because it was a bit slow for my taste, but I also found it to be "clunky" in a way that I can't really describe and generally, I can fish or cast most anything well enough.
 
#6 · (Edited)
Let's see a 9 foot 5 piece rod is 21.6 inches a 9 foot 4 piece is 27 inches and although I have several 'Travel Rods' , they are 6 piece designs. I think the difference between a 4 piece and 5 piece is negligible. And many will argue that ferrules detrimentally affect the action of a rod, although I don't agree with that any longer.
 
#7 ·
Let's see a 9 foot 5 piece rod is 21.6 inches a 9 foot 4 piece is 27 inches and although I have several 'Travel Rods' , they are 6 piece designs. I don't think the difference between a 4 piece and 5 piece is negligible. And many will argue that ferrules detrimentally affect the action of a rod, although I don't agree with that any longer.
Yes, I'm probably leaning towards something that's quite compact, like a 6-piece rod. I do find the 5-piece Winstons to be interesting and did bid on a few that came up at auction a few years back (I was too cheap to buy any though), but you are correct, I'm really looking for something a bit smaller and 4 weight rods aren't what I'm referring to either (I already have a ton of them and I'm trying to avoid having to find a way to get them packed as is.
 
#8 ·
#9 ·
I've thought about this myself and would probably go with the Hardy Aydon Travel in the 9' wt and the 8' 4wt. The price isn't bad and if I needed a 6pc to fit into a smaller suitcase, those should fit the bill. Unless my trip was entirely about fishing, in which case I would bring my 4pc rods, I imagine those two 6pc rods would serve my trout fishing needs very well.
 
#10 ·
It is always the wizard and not the wand! That means you buy what you "like" within the confines of what you "need." If I'm fishing salt flats in the wind you need fast action rod. I know of only one rod with that fits that description and it only comes as a blank if you can find it. Just about all the travel rods are in the medium to medium fast category. So what do you do if you need a fast rod? One option is to play with line pairings and the other is to go up one weight if you need a fast 7 consider a medium 8.

Certain rods like that winston 5piece LT series have a particular feel. As trout rods you may really like that like I do. It's the classic 5wt. "winston feel" I love. But nothing else feels like that. Bamboo in general feels completely different as does a fast action 5wt. But none of those actions change trout fishing because the tool needed for general trout fishing is not technically demanding. Everything works! I have never fished a "bad" rod that I would never want to pick up again. Carbon is carbon like fiber glass is fiberglass. There are aficionados to who swear this glass is money compared to some other. But if they had crap glass they would still catch fish. I got a $28 Temu 8 piece 5 wt. carbon fiber rod that has caught 100's of fish and it will catch fish just as well as my Winston LT. Where I will not compromise is reel choice. I'm an old Abel guy. All my Abels retrieve one way and all function the same from 3wt.-12wt including on my 2 hand rods. There are many travel rods out there. Think about how you will fish and just pick one. I used to be just an overhead caster. Line pairings can widen the range of what your rod can do for you.
 
#11 ·
It is always the wizard and not the wand! That means you buy what you "like" within the confines of what you "need." If I'm fishing salt flats in the wind you need fast action rod. I know of only one rod with that fits that description and it only comes as a blank if you can find it. Just about all the travel rods are in the medium to medium fast category. So what do you do if you need a fast rod? One option is to play with line pairings and the other is to go up one weight if you need a fast 7 consider a medium 8.

Certain rods like that winston 5piece LT series have a particular feel. As trout rods you may really like that like I do. It's the classic 5wt. "winston feel" I love. But nothing else feels like that. Bamboo in general feels completely different as does a fast action 5wt. But none of those actions change trout fishing because the tool needed for general trout fishing is not technically demanding. Everything works! I have never fished a "bad" rod that I would never want to pick up again. Carbon is carbon like fiber glass is fiberglass. There are aficionados to who swear this glass is money compared to some other. But if they had crap glass they would still catch fish. I got a $28 Temu 8 piece 5 wt. carbon fiber rod that has caught 100's of fish and it will catch fish just as well as my Winston LT. Where I will not compromise is reel choice. I'm an old Abel guy. All my Abels retrieve one way and all function the same from 3wt.-12wt including on my 2 hand rods. There are many travel rods out there. Think about how you will fish and just pick one. I used to be just an overhead caster. Line pairings can widen the range of what your rod can do for you.

Interesting that it took 9 replies before the performance of rods was mentioned. I have 4 rods of 7 or 8 pieces, only one of which I would fish if not constrained by pack size. Rods with 7+ pieces tend to be too bendy for my taste. Don't select a rod purely on pack size, brand reputation or price.
 
#14 · (Edited)
Allow me to say that whatever it is you're going to do get it done because things are going insane price wise. If you are just a fisherman like me then most of the suggested rods will be swell. I gave up on seeing how far I could cast roughly 30 years ago and so my rod tastes center on what I like and can in good conscience afford.

For unencumbered travel with a fly rod within the United States consider how to attach a shoulder strap to whatever you choose. I recently went down to Washington and took my Hardy Swift 11 1/2 foot 4 piece which has a shoulder strap right on the rod tube. Sweet is all I can say about that, easiest carry ever and you just put it in the overhead there will be room for it. On the post about the Winston LT rods maybe you noticed that I had a neat little Camo rod bag with shoulder strap made for it, slick that one.